Daniel v. Daniel
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Error to the Clarice Circuit* Partners and partnership. Assumpsit. Assumpsit. Case 50.
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Simpson
delivered, the opinion of the Court.
Jesse Daniel and William H. Nelson having raised a Grop of corn in co-partnership, Daniel, who owned two thirds, gave tó his son, Ellison A. Daniel, about one hundred and eighty barrels of it, who took it into his-possession, and appropriated it to his own use.
' This action of assumpsit was brought in the name of the partners, for the use of Nelson, against Ellison A.' Daniel,' for the value of the corn, treating him as a pur*196chaser. The plaintiffs, by way of specification of the demand claimed by them in the suit, stated at the foot of the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Locke v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Ingham Lumber Co. v. IngersollSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Viles v. BangsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Bourne v. WooldridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1850
- Gowan v. GowanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.