Bradham v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of misdemeanor; from - city court of Brunswick— Judge Krauss. September 29, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
“In this ease the motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds. There was some slight evidence authorizing the verdict; and the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court a reviewing court is powerless to interfere. When the verdict is apparently decidedly against the weight of the evidence, the' trial judge has a wide discretion as to granting or refusing a new trial; but whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Toole v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- McCarty v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Cook v. McMurriaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by42 opinions
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Lacount v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Smith v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Page v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Townsend v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.