Legal Opinion

Roy R. Hubbard, Administrator of the Estate of William E. Hubbard v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1956No. 12661_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this action, appellant, as the administrator of the decedent William E. Hubbard, charged the appellee railroad company with the negligent operation of an engine and its tender, causing a collision on U. S. Highway 42 near Hageman, Ohio, between the train and a truck being driven by the decedent. The driver of the truck was killed in the collision. At the close of appellee’s case, the District Judge sustained appellee’s motion for a directed verdict.

Appellant contends that there was negligence on the part of appellee in backing its engine and tender slowly across the highway so as to block…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reed v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Jackson v. FrederickOhio Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glenna Frances Tuck, Administratrix of the Estate of George William Tuck, Deceased v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API