Legal Opinion
Durand v. Litscher
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 3, 2017No. 16-3569PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Employees of the state’s Sex Offender Registry Program concluded that a Wisconsin statute enacted in 2009 mandates that Antonio Durand wear a GPS tracking device for the rest of his life because twice he had been convicted of a sex offense, most recently in 1993. In this action against several Program administrators and the Secretary of the state’s prison system, Durand claims that, specifically as to him, GPS monitoring violates the Ex Post Facto Clause, U.S. Const, art. I, § 10. He also contends that the statute, as written, does not apply to him. The district court dismissed the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert Anthony Whiteaker v. Jared Hoy, Grace Knutson, and Stephanie OlmstedDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026