Legal Opinion

Stears v. Hollenbeck

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 17, 1874PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Bremer Circuit Court. Action in chancery to foreclose a mortgage. There was a decree for plaintiff. Defendant Hollenbeck appeals. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

— Hollenbeck purchased the premises, after the mortgage in suit was executed, from the mortgagors and received from them a warranty deed, excepting from its covenants the mortgage and all back taxes. The mortgagors are united with him as defendants herein. As a defense to the action he pleads that he holds title to the land under a tax deed executed, after his purchase and deed from the mortgagors, upon a sale for taxes before due and delinquent, and which 'are therefore excepted from the warranty of the deed to him. Plaintiff, replying to Hollenbeck’s answer, sets up substantially the same…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McMinn v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Lacey v. Davis & McFarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Smith v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Kelsey v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fair v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Jordan v. SayreSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  3. Koch v. Kiron State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Hawkeye Life Insurance v. Valley-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Gorton v. PaineSupreme Court of Florida · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API