Legal Opinion

Panhandle Traction Co. v. Schenk

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Ohio County. Condemnation proceedings by the Panhandle Traction Company against Albert M. Schenk and others. From an order James H. Emblen, trustee, and others, 'bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, Judge :

The Panhandle Traction Company, in July, 1911, upon notice, instituted proceedings in the circuit court of Ohio county to condemn certain lands of Albert Schenk and others for its railroad purposes. The court, in lieu of a jury, having heard the evidence introduced at the trial, found in favor of *227the petitioner upon the pleas tendered and filed. Pursuant to the findings, by the same order, it appointed, as required by statute, commissioners to ascertain and report the damages by way of compensation for the lands sought to be appropriated. The commissioners viewed the lands, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Luxton v. North River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Bluefield v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Ludlow v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
  5. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Norfolk & Western R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. United Fuel Gas Co. v. DeberryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Ketchum Coal Co. v. Pleasant Valley Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Sewell Valley Railroad v. McClungWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API