Ex parte Mayor of Birmingham
Supreme Court of Alabama
The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. cited Ballentyne v. Wicker sham, 75 Ala. 533 ; Judson v. Bessemer, 87 Ala. 240 ; Morris v. S. & N. R. R. Co., 65 Ala. 193 ; Tatúm v. State, 82 Ala. 5 ; Block v. State, 66 Ala. 493 ; Ex parte Moore, 62 Ala. 474; Hare v. Kennerly, 83 Ala. 608 ; Randolph v. Builders & Painters Supply Co., 106 Ala. 501.
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
On the 14th day of April, 1897, John H. Powell having been arrested on a charge of disorderly conduct in violation of section 599 of the by-laws and ordinances of the city of Birmingham, entered a plea of guilty in the inferior court of criminal jurisdiction in the city of Birmingham. The judgment entry is as follows : “Defendant pleaded guilty. On hearing the evidence *188tlie court is of the opinion that defendant is guilty, and it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the defendant is guilty and is fined $15 and cost and thirty days extra at hard labor. If fine and costs are not paid,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Woolf v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Barnhill v. TeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
3Cited by25 opinions
- Alford v. State ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- State ex rel. Winter v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Lacey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
- Mitchell v. State ex rel. Florence DispensarySupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Hawkins v. Roberts & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.