Gordon v. Webb
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
In this case, Porterfield, in his answer to interrogatories, acknowledged himself to be the debtor of Webb; and disclosed a number of circumstances going strongly to show an assignment of the debt to one Pierce, previous to the service upon him of the writ in this suit.
1Opinion of the Court
But the Court said, that it sufficiently appeared, from the disclosure of the supposed trustee, that an assignment had been made, and notice thereof seasonably given to Porterfield. Such an assignment, sufficient in point of form, must be supported on á process of this nature, or bond fide assignees may be injured and defrauded, without possibility of relief. To avoid mischief to the attaching creditor, it has often been suggested by the Court, that he should summon the assignee, by whose examination the * whole transaction might be made to appear. Although his rights are expressly to be…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hubbard v. LamburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- United States v. LangtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1829
- Nashville Bank v. RagsdaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1823
- Webster v. GageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Beckwith v. BaxterSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1824
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.