Logan v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
Defendants appeal from their arrest and conviction for obstructing an officer, which resulted from their entry onto and quarrelsome presence on premises which were being searched subsequent to an arrest.
1. There is no merit in defendants’ first enumeration of error. The trial judge charged the jury that "it must be shown to you beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendants knowingly and wilfully obstructed or hindered officer Willard Fell in the lawful discharge of his official duties.” The court went on to give the legal definition of "wilful” and "knowing.”
The judge charged…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Grace v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- O'Brien v. Buffalo Furnace Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Grand Forks v. CameronNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Wells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Dumas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.