Legal Opinion

Sarno v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1964No. 40546Published

1Opinion of the Court

110 Ga. App. 164 (1964)

138 S.E.2d 96

SARNO et al.

v.

HOFFMAN.

40546.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided July 15, 1964.

Rehearing Denied July 30, 1964.

T. J. Long, Ben Weinberg, Jr., for plaintiffs in error.

John E. Rogers, Maurice H. Hilliard, Jr., contra.

HALL, Judge.

1. Where the facts show a relationship, such as that between innkeeper and guest, from which a duty to know the conditions of the premises and facilities arises, then a general averment that the defendant knew or should have known of the defects from which injury resulted is sufficient. Hillinghorst v. Heart of Atlanta Motel, 104 Ga.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Fulton Ice & Coal Co. v. PeceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Georgia Power Co. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Thomas v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Lee v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API