CF Industries, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
This case concerns which agency — FERC or the ICC — has jurisdiction to regulate rates charged for the transport of anhydrous ammonia by pipeline. Both FERC and the ICC agree that the authority is the ICC’s. CF Industries believes otherwise, and petitions for review of a FERC order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction a com*246plaint seeking refund of allegedly excessive pipeline rates. We deny the petition.
I
Anhydrous ammonia is an agricultural fertilizer derived from natural gas or petroleum refinery gas and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cf Industries, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991