Legal Opinion

Anthony v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Leo F. Hayes, J.

The sole issue before this court is whether defendant, Con*718solidated Rail Corporation, may be held liable as an owner within the meaning of Labor Law § 240. By stipulation of counsel the action was bifurcated, and the issue of liability was tried by the court. After trial, the court made the following findings:(1) Defendant, Conrail, was the owner of a right-of-way that generally ran east and west through an area in the City of Syracuse, that at one time was used as a rail line in the conduct of its railroad business. The area of the right-of-way involved in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Kerr v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Mangiameli v. GalanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Dodge v. West Harlem Pork Center, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API