Legal Opinion · Dissent

Herald Co. v. Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 2006No. Docket 128263Published

1DissentCavanagh, J.

Today’s majority decision is an example of a court properly articulating the law, yet failing to apply it correctly. Because I strongly disagree with the majority’s position that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it held that defendant Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents met its burden under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), MCL 15.231 et seq., I must respectfully dissent.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff Herald Company, Inc., doing business as Booth Newspapers, Inc., and Ann Arbor News, sought disclosure of a number of public records related to the building of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Herald Co. v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Swickard v. Wayne County Medical ExaminerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API