Conte v. Meyer
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Vollack
The majority holds that Joanne Conte’s (Conte) petition was “continuously filed,” for the purposes of the statutory requirements, every day from July 18, 1994, until August 2, 1994. Maj. op. at 965. I disagree. Section *967l-4-802(l)(g), IB C.R.S. (1994 Supp.), is clear and unambiguous, and mandates that a candidate be registered at least twelve months prior to the date of filing of the petition. The Uniform Election Code requires independent candidates to meet its statutory mandate before their names can appear on the ballot. Since Conte failed to meet that mandate, I respectfully dissent.
I
Candid…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East Lakewood Sanitation District v. District Court in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Eileen M. Thournir v. Natalie Meyer, Secretary of State for the State of Colorado and State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Sargent School District No. RE-33J v. Western Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Husson v. MeekerColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.