Chattanooga, Rome & Columbus Railroad v. East Rome Town Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Railroads. Amendment. Before Judge Meyerhardt. City court of Eloyd county. June term, 1891. The plaintiff' sued the railroad company for $500 with interest from January 1,1888, alleging that on or about that day the defendant, by virtue of its chai’ter, entered upon, took possession of and converted to its use one half an acre of land which, prior to that time, was in the possession of and was the property of plaintiff, and which is a part of lot number 285 in the 23d…
Read the full summary
Railroads. Amendment. Before Judge Meyerhardt. City court of Eloyd county. June term, 1891. The plaintiff' sued the railroad company for $500 with interest from January 1,1888, alleging that on or about that day the defendant, by virtue of its chai’ter, entered upon, took possession of and converted to its use one half an acre of land which, prior to that time, was in the possession of and was the property of plaintiff, and which is a part of lot number 285 in the 23d district and 3d section of Floyd county, Georgia, and joins the right of way theretofore granted by plaintiff to defendant…
1Opinion of the Court
*732 Judgment reversed.
W. W. Brooices, W. T. Turnbull and J. Branham, for plaintiff' in error. Dabney & Fouché, contra.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Lamar v. Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- George M. Couch, Inc. v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957