Legal Opinion

State v. Rhinehart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1979No. 46039PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, C.J.

James Rhinehart, petitioner herein, was charged by information with possession of stolen property in the first degree. At the close of the State's case, defendant moved for dismissal claiming that the State had failed to prove a prima facie case. The motion was granted and the court ruled the State had proved neither value nor guilty knowledge. On appeal the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court by a 2 to 1 vote. We affirm the trial court and reverse the Court of Appeals.

There are two questions presented. Should the court deny a motion to dismiss for lack of sufficient evidence made at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RoybalWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. State v. MaynerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. ValladaresWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. StrohmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API