State v. Plambeck
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, P.J.
in which KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
The question we confront today is whether the trial court has general authority to dismiss an indictment without prejudice in the absence of the State’s consent. The answer to that question is “no.” Consequently, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
I. BACKGROUND
This case involved three sets of indictments charging appellee with barratry and conspiracy to commit barratry. The first set of indictments was obtained from grand jury proceedings in which a Texas Ranger was allowed to question witnesses extensively, in violation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prystash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- State v. MorenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State v. YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Gonzalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
3Cited by115 opinions
- Perry, Ex Parte James Richard "Rick"Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Morales, Jose ManuelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Ex parte ReyesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- State v. Alexander Elliot Dinur, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- Metts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.