Legal Opinion
United States v. Prandy-Binnet
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 4, 1991No. Crim. A. 91-0342PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SPORKIN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendant, Pedro Prandy-Binnet’s (“Prandy”), motion to suppress physical evidence and other “fruits” obtained on May 22, 1991 by officers of the Metropolitan Police Department. Because the procedures used by the police in this case violated the defendant’s rights under the Fourth Amendment, the motion to suppress is granted.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On August 28, 1991, the Court held a hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress. Testimony was taken from the defendant, the two arresting officers, Detective John Centrella and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Pedro Jolio Prandy-BinettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Unknown Agents of the United States Marshals ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- United States v. Pedro Jolio Prandy-BinettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Pedro Jolio Prandy-BinettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Pedro Jolio Prandy-BinettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.