Legal Opinion
Krueger v. Ponton
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 13, 2009No. 5D08-1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, C.J.
Scott and Cynthia Krueger appeal the order entered by the trial court setting aside a default final judgment which had been entered in their favor. Concluding that damages claimed by the Kruegers were liquidated, we reverse the order setting aside the default final judgment except as to the Kruegers’ claims for attorney’s fees and costs.
The Kruegers filed a complaint against Paul and Marlene Ponton. Pertinent to this appeal, the Kruegers sought treble damages for a bad check pursuant to section 68.065 of the Florida Statutes (2004).
According to the complaint, the Krueg-ers and the Pontons…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cellular Warehouse, Inc. v. GH CELLULARDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Sterling Factors v. US Bank Nat. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Phenion Development Group, Inc. v. LoveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Johnson v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Belcourt v. HaraczkaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tannenbaum v. SheaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Condominium Ass'n of La Mer Estates v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Ciprian-Escapa v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Office of the Attorney Gen. v. Nationwide Pools, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Office of the Attorney Gen. v. Nationwide Pools, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.