Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Knack
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Grays Harbor county, Sheeks, J., entered April 22, 1916, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Parker, J. —
The plaintiff, Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Company, seeks recovery of a balance due upon the purchase price of lumber and shingles sold by it to the defendant, Ered Knack, in the year 1911. Trial in the superior court without a jury resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the defendant, rested upon the ground that the action had not been commenced within the time limited by law. From this disposition of the cause, the plaintiff has appealed to this court.
The evidence is not before us. We have only to do with the question of what judgment should be rendered upon the facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Engmann v. Estate of ImmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Stubblefield v. McAuliffWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Shannon v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eastman v. CraryOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Hein v. ForneyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Ross v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Grissom v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 1938