State v. Christine
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentFournet, Chief Justice
The trial judge, in quashing the bill of information charging the defendant, Lilly Christine, with obscenity, in violation of RS 14:106(3), gives, in an able and well-considered opinion, an exhaustive analysis of the jurisprudence of this court on the subj ect matter; and, in concluding that the phrase “Performance * * * of any act of lewdness or indecency” as used in the act and in charging the accused is, taken either alone or in context, so indefinite, vague, and uncertain it renders Paragraph 3 of RS 14:-106 invalid and unenforceable, summarizes the substance of the pertinent…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- State v. TrubySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- State v. VallerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- State v. GasterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.