Legal Opinion

Istvan Kele v. United States Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 11, 1985No. 85-1642PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Istvan Kele appeals from a district court order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Kele contends that the court erred in holding that the United States Parole Commission complied with the district court’s August 31, 1984, order requiring the Commission to give Kele a new initial parole hearing at which it would more adequately consider: 1) the parole status of Kele’s codefendants; 2) Kele’s claim that there is insufficient evidence that he was the one who committed the murder during the robbery; and 3) that even if there was such evidence, that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frank Briggs v. United States Parole Commission Marion Lacy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Reynolds v. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madonna, Matthew v. U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Istvan Kele v. Peter Carlson, Warden, and United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Istvan Kele v. Peter Carlson, Warden, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API