Legal Opinion
Haff v. Pilling
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided January 20, 1905No. 12PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
This is a motion for a new trial, for the reasons (1) the verdict was against the evidence; and (2) against the weight of the evidence.
Mr. Haff brought suit for the recovery of damages for the breach of contract into which he had entered with defendants for the delivery of coal. The dispute arose out of the following facts:
On August 20, 1902, Haff made a contract with the defendants for the delivery of 10,500 gross tons of “Sonman Shaft Bituminous Steam Coal,” f. o. b. cars at piers Pennsylvania Railroad Company, South Amboy, N. J., in about equal monthly quantities…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Kutztown Foundry & Machine Co. v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Producers' Coke Co. v. McKeefrey Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
- Continental Grain Co. v. Simpson Feed Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1951
- Wickham & Burton Coal Co. v. Minnesota Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1925