State v. Sullivan
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWillamowski, J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant William E. Sullivan, Jr. ("Sullivan") appeals the judgment of the Municipal Court of Findlay, Ohio, alleging that (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of his Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test ("HGN Test"); (2) the trial court erred in denying his Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal; (3) the trial court erred by overruling his objections to the admission of testimony that referenced research discussing the accuracy of the HGN Test; and (4) the jury returned a verdict that was against the manifest weight of the evidence. For the reasons set…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- State v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. McWayOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. RandleOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. TaflingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.