Legal Opinion

Marx v. McKinney

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1943No. L. A. 18410PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff herein sued upon two alternative causes of action:

1. For money received prior to November 1, 1938, by defendant and sole appellant Fred P. Glick, “individually and doing business as Fabriform Steel Products Co., successor to the Welded Products Co. Inc., . . . for the use and benefit of one, George Karp, the plaintiff’s assignor.”

2. For money claimed to have been owing by defendant-appellant Glick to a judgment debtor of plaintiff, one R. L. McKinney (also named as a defendant herein), at the time of levy upon appellant, under the provisions of section 542, subdivision 6, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Union Supply Co. v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cockerell v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Nichols v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API