Legal Opinion

Com. of Pa. v. Baker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1934No. Appeals 404 and 405PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Appellant was convicted of having violated the provisions of the Act of April 23, 1909, P. L. 159, — the offense commonly known as ‘receiving stolen goods.’ It will be noted that the act — which is printed in the margin — makes it a felony for any person to bay, have or receive any goods, etc. which shall have been stolen or feloniously taken, knoioing the same to have been stolen or feloniously taken. The sixth assignment of error complains that the learned trial judge in charging the jury defined the offense as follows: “Now, what is the crime of receiving stolen goods?…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ErnestoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Huggins v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ciampoli v. HestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Kilrow v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  5. Commonwealth v. AultSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Commonwealth v. RichmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Commonwealth v. SendrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Commonwealth v. WeissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API