Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Lee

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 27, 1996No. Civil Action No. 95-1451PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FALLON, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant McNamara Investment Corporation’s (hereinafter McNamara) motion for a new trial, or in the alternative, to alter or amend the judgment. In an Order and Reasons entered July 12, 1996, this Court granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment finding that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) due process rights had been violated by the lack of notice to the tax sale in question.1 A judgment was duly entered by *257this Court in favor of the plaintiff on July 16, 1996. It is from this judgment that defendant McNamara seeks relief.

M…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Bernice H. ShanbaumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. State Hospital for Criminal Insane v. Consolidated Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. State Ex Rel. Brenner v. NoeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Cost v. St. Landry Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Roussel v. NoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roy Anderson Corporation v. 225 Baronne Complex, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API