Legal Opinion
Kinzy v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 10, 2008No. A08A1148PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
Lester Kinzy sought coverage from his uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM”) carrier, Farmers Insurance Exchange (“Farmers”), for injuries suffered in a “road rage” altercation with another motorist. The trial court granted summary judgment to Farmers, and Kinzy appeals. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). The underlying facts in this case are undisputed. On March 19, 2004, Kinzy left home in his car to go shopping.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southeastern Fidelity Insurance v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Rustin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. WilburCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Atlanta Postal Credit Union v. International Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Longabaugh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ankerich v. SavkoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Lancer Insurance Co. v. United National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Melanie Savko v. Kay AnkerichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Mough v. Progressive Max Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Progressive Mountain Insurance Company v. KaufmanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020