Holliston v. Ernston
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the dismissal of the former appeal, reported in 120 Minn. 507, 139 N. W. 805, plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint and findings was granted and his motion to amend the order for judgment was denied, Qvale, J. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff and defendants appealed. Affirmed on defendants’ appeal. Never sed on plaintiff’s appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtPi-iilit E. Brown, J.
Action for specific performance, by injunction, of a contract not to engage in business. The cause was tried to the court, findings made, and judgment ordered for plaintiff for partial relief. An appeal therefrom was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Subsequently the complaint and findings were amended on plaintiff’s motion, judgment was entered awarding him no greater relief, and both parties appealed.
The trial court found in substance: For years prior to June 14, 1911, defendants were engaged, for others, in operating omnibus and baggage transfer lines in Granite Falls, and thus acquired…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kramer v. . OldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- State v. Duluth Board of TradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Andrews v. KingsburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- National Benefit Co. v. Union Hospital Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- World's Columbian Exposition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Robert E. Hedberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Menter Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Bess v. BothmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Naftalin v. John Wood CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.