Jensvold v. Kunz Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 250 N.W. 815. Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an order denying compensation. The commission held that relator's injury did not arise out of or in the course of his employment. The only question here is whether that decision is wrong as matter of law.
For some time before May 7, 1932, relator was employed by the Kunz Oil Company as a sales agent. He was to give his employer the use of his automobile, which, impliedly at least, he agreed to keep in repair but which was used as needed for his own purposes and those of his family. While driving one day in the course…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manley v. Harvey Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Green v. County of ChippewaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Grina v. Stenerson Brothers Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Jensvold v. Kunz Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Casey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Ulve v. BEMIDJI COOPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Johnson v. Nash-Finch Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Soule v. Red Wing Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Williams v. W. W. Wallwork, Moorhead, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950