Legal Opinion

State v. Sallee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of the crime of knowingly uttering and publishing a forged bank check. The appeal is based upon the contention that defendant was not informed of his right to remain silent or of his right to counsel and that ORS 133.550 was violated in that he was not promptly brought before a magistrate.

Since the alleged violation of ORS 133.550 was not asserted at the trial, it cannot be raised upon appeal. State v. Allen, 241 Or 95, 404 P2d 207 (1965).

Defendant concedes that he was informed of his right to counsel but he contends that he was not so informed until after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ErvinOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. DaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API