Legal Opinion

Gooberman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 13, 1997No. 97-1031PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have for review an order of the trial court summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850. Appellant makes three arguments: (1) that a recently propounded DOC incentive gain-time rule, which presumably would render him ineligible for a certain portion of gain-time, is unconstitutional and otherwise illegal; (2) that his attorney was ineffective in advising appellant that he would receive a specific amount of gain-time, thereby inducing appellant to enter a plea to the charges; and (3) that as a result of the foregoing, his plea was involuntary.

Regarding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newsome v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Barber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API