Legal Opinion

Causey v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 1962No. 17893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

The respondents’ tobacco barn burned while being occupied for tobacco curing purposes and they recovered judgment against the appellant for loss of their barn under a fire insurance policy issued by the appellant to the respondents. Question arose in the trial as to the type building covered by the terms of the policy. While admitting that *117the building covered by the policy was a tobacco curing barn and that such fact was known to appellant’s agent at the time of the issuance of the policy, the appellant contended in the lower Court that the terms of the policy specifically…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Field v. GREGORYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Priester v. PriesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. Hewitt v. Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Shea v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. Echols v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blakeley v. RabonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Boyer v. Loftin-Woodard, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API