Kolar v. State

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Phillip Monroe Kolar appeals his conviction on one count of child molestation, 1 challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and arguing on constitutional grounds that the court should have sentenced him as a misdemeanant only. Discerning no error, we affirm.

1. When reviewing a defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. Short v. State. 2 We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness…