Bachrack v. Norton
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley
This is an action on a marshal’s bond, against him and his sureties, to recover. damages for his wrongful taking of the goods of the plaintiff under an attachment issued out of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas, against one Myerson. According to the decision in Feibelman v. Packard, 109 U. S. 421, it is a case arising under the laws of the United States, and is therefore within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court without any. averment of citizenship of the parties.
The plaintiff avers that Myerson had previously assigned the goods to him' for the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Feibelman v. PackardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Cunningham v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Windham v. Patty & MathewsTexas Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Sonnentheil v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Howard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Steele v. HalliganDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
- Clark v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.