Paul H. Jones and Pushmataha Plantation, Inc. v. Anderson-Tully Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants Jones and Pushmataha Plantations, Inc., referred to collectively herein as “Jones,” appeal the district court’s determination that a Motion for Correction of Judgment, filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) and pertaining to a judgment originally entered in April of 1977, involves substantive rights of the parties, and therefore is governed by Rule 60(b) and barred by the one-year statute of limitations contained therein. We affirm the district court.
In 1977 Jones and Anderson-Tully owned adjoining tracts of riparian land. The Mississippi River formed the southern…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dura-Wood Treating Company, Division of Roy O. Martin Lumber Company v. Century Forest Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Inc. v. George E. Breece Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Warner v. City of Bay St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- J.C. Trahan v. The First National Bank of RustonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Hale v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by32 opinions
- Frank Olle, Jr. Automatic Press Corporation and James W. Cato v. The Henry & Wright CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Rutherford v. Harris County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Jessica T. And Halver L. Moolenaar v. Government of the Virgin Islands and Virgin Islands Port Authority. Appeal of Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Rudolph WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.