Legal Opinion

Steele By-Products Co. v. McGee Cowart

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1922No. 6 Div. 59Published

1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.

'The demurrers to count 3 of the complaint should have been sustained.

While the allegation that the .plaintiffs “were ready, willing and able to perform said contract according to the terms thereof,” was sufficient to show ability to comply with the contract within the time specified by. the terms thereof, on the part of the plaintiff, yet the breach thereof, charged to the defendant,- that it “breached said agreement by refusing ’to accept” the commodity-named in the agreement, is not an allegation that the refusal to accept occurred while the contract was. binding upon., the defendant.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Clinton Mining Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. J. C. Lysle Milling Co. v. North Alabama Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API