Legal Opinion

People v. Berisha

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eileen N. Nadelson, J.

*345Defendant moves to preclude the People from introducing at trial statements made by defendant on the grounds that the prosecution did not timely serve a CPL 710.30 notice following the filing of a superceding complaint.

Neither side denies that the People served and filed a statement notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 within 15 days of defendant’s arraignment on the initial complaint. The statement of defendant appearing with the notice has not changed. Defendant’s argument is based on the fact that the People did not reserve such notice after filing a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. HainesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
  3. People v. AlcindorCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993
  4. People v. KorangNew York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API