In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Issued May 3, 1994 for Nash

ORDER & MEMORANDUM DECISION

ROLL, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court are motions to quash grand jury subpoenas filed by four criminal defense attorneys who have been directed to appear and produce records concerning fee arrangements with certain clients. For the reasons set forth below, the motions to quash are denied as to all four attorneys. The objections to the timing of the subpoenas as to three of the attorneys are sustained while the objection of the fourth defense attorney to the timing of the subpoena is overruled.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Attorneys Walter B. Nash III,…