Legal Opinion

City of Biddeford v. Holland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 9, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.

[¶ 1] Rory Holland appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Crowley, J.) dismissing his notice of appeal and demand for a jury trial de novo following a bench trial in the District Court (Biddeford, Brennan, J.) in a land use enforcement action brought by the City of Biddeford pursuant to 30-A M.R.S.A. § 4452 (1996 & Supp.2004) and M.R. Civ. P 80K. Holland argues that he has the right to a jury trial de novo in the Superior Court because he has the constitutional right to a jury trial and he could not have removed this case to the Superior Court and received a jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF BOOTHBAY, ETC. v. RussellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. City of Portland v. DePaoloSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  3. Dissell v. Trans World AirlinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  4. In Re CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PIKE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. City of WestbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Jorge A. Torres v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  3. Manon Cote v. Roger ValleeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API