Legal Opinion

Austin v. U S West, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1996No. 96CA0066PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge BRIGGS.

Defendants, U S West, Inc., U S West Overseas Operations, Inc., and U S West International, Inc., appeal the order of the trial court finding that the claims of plaintiffs, Douglas Austin and Nicholas Bate (employees) and Nada Austin and Ange Bate (wives), were not subject to the arbitration clause in the employees’ employment agreements. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.

The employees each responded to advertisements concerning employment with defendants in Russia to operate a cellular phone joint venture. After negotiations with defendants…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Brody v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Mar-Len of Louisiana, Inc. v. Parsons-Gilbane, a Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re J.D. Edwards World Solutions Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Rains v. Foundation Health Systems Life & HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. EAGLE RIDGE CONDOMINIUM ASS'N. v. Metropolitan Builders, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Digital Landscape Inc. v. Media Kings LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API