Legal Opinion

Petit v. Petit

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The primary question raised on this appeal is whether the power of appointment given by-the will of Louis Petit was validly exercised in favor of the wife of Clement, he having died childless. Appellant contends that the lower court erred in construing the provision for the power of appointment to permit Clement to appoint his wife as beneficiary when there were no children him surviving.

Respondent and appellants and the lower court all assert that the words of the will are plain and unambiguous and therefore not open to judicial construction. Yet there has been created a decided disagreement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Upham v. PlankintonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Holmes v. WalterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Benner v. MauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Stone v. StoneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Tracy v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1818

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of RhodesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Guam Federation of Teachers v. CruzDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2016
  3. LeFever v. FiliatraultWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API