Legal Opinion

Fellows v. Canney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari to thé circuit court commissioner of Muskegon county to review proceedings for transfer of suit. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

In 1886, the defendant in error commenced a suit, in the circuit court for the county of Muskegon, against the plaintiff. An issue was joined therein, and the cause was tried before Judge Russell, with a jury, at the October term, 1887, and the defendant prevailed. At the time of the trial, Mrs. Canney resided in Muskegon, and Mr. Farr, of Ottawa county, was her attorney in the suit. Mr. Fellows resided in Nebraska, and Mr. DeLong, of Muskegon, was his attorney.

On the seventeenth of November, Mrs. Canney, by her attorney, moved the court to set aside the verdict and j udg. ment, and grant a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Curtis v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Huhn v. QuinnWyoming Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API