Legal Opinion

State v. Fair

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1969No. 11121, 11195PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a jury’s verdict and judgment entered thereon, for uttering a forged, prescription under the Uniform Narcotic *35Drug Act,1 and from a judgment denying a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pending the appeal, which had to do with the same problem, and which we ordered consolidated with the regular appeal. The judgment on petition for habeas corpus is affirmed (Case No. 11195, this court), and the case on the regular appeal (Case No. 11121, this court), is remanded for resen-tencing in accordance with the provisions of 58-17-14.13 (L.Utah 1965, Ch. 117, Sec. 2,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ShondelUtah Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BosworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. State v. LovelessUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. LevinUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. FairUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. LovelessUtah Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API