Legal Opinion

Ward v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 7, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a partial summary judgment granted in Franklin Circuit Court directing the appellants to comply with an investigative demand issued by the Attorney General under authority of the Consumer Protection Act. Appellants challenge the issuance of the demand on the ground that there is no allegation of a violation. They further argue that the Attorney General has not met the statutory requirements for issuance as upheld in Commonwealth v. Pineur, Ky., 533 S.W.2d 527 (1976).

Initially, this case presents a procedural problem because a panel of this court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Turner v. LimbrechtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. Commonwealth by Packel v. ZiomekCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Liggins v. May Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1975
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hancock v. PineurKentucky Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dolomite Energy, LLC v. Commonwealth Office of Financial InstitutionsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  2. Business Doe, LLC v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ex Rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of Kentucky v. Jones & Panda, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
  4. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Ex Rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of Kentucky v. Jones & Panda, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API