Legal Opinion

People v. Karmelich

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1979No. Crim. 33040PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.

Defendants were jointly charged with possession of heroin, in violation of section 11350 of the Health and Safety Code. After a trial by juiy, they were found guilty as charged and sentenced to state prison. They have appealed; we affirm.

On this appeal, defendants contend: (1) That the trial court erred in denying their motion for the identity of an informant; and (2) that the evidence does not support the verdicts of guilt. We reject both contentions.

I

Based on an affidavit stating that the officer had received information both from a tested and from an untested…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. SalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. RubacalbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. People v. Polk, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. Bustamante CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Garza CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API