Legal Opinion

Cannarella v. Cannarella

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 30, 1980No. 21355Published

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

Petitioner Rose C. Cannarella (wife) sought pendente lite (1) alimony, (2) attorney’s fees, and (3) suit money from respondent Vincent J. Cannarella (husband). The family court judge awarded her only the temporary attorney’s fees and suit money. She appeals from the denial of temporary alimony.

The parties were married in June, 1978. In April, 1979, the husband left his wife. He informed her that she could remain in the house until she found another place to live. (The house is owned by the husband’s children by a prior marriage.) The wife vacated the premises in July,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poliakoff v. PoliakoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API