Legal Opinion

Weisman v. Weisman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1985No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— The appeals are from (1) so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Deutsch, J.), dated August 3, 1983, as declined to exercise jurisdiction over a proceeding by the paternal grandparents, pursuant to section 651 of the Family Court Act, for visitation with their grandchildren; (2) an order of the same court (Deutsch, J.), dated December 8,1983, which, inter alia, dismissed *806the proceeding; and (3) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Duberstein, J.), dated November 7, 1983, as, in a matrimonial action between the parents of the grandchildren, denied the motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Lo Presti v. Lo PrestiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Ehrlich v. RessnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Vacula v. BlumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. 1995 AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Guma v. GumaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API