Wiley v. Hartzler (In Re Wiley)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRESSEL, Chief Judge.
William Carl Wiley appeals from the order of the bankruptcy court 1 which granted Geoffrey and Dorothy Hartzler relief from the automatic stay. Because we believe the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
In 1998, the Hartzlers, residents of Johnson County, Kansas, wanted to build a home in Camden County, Missouri. The Hartzlers contacted William C. Wiley Construction, Inc. 2 The Hartzlers allege that the parties orally agreed that Wiley Construction would be paid a 12% mark-up, above and beyond time and materials. On October 2, 1998, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Popkin & SternCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Wendover Financial Services v. Hervey (In Re Hervey)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Barcal v. Laughlin (In Re Barcal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Bock Laundry MacHine Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Keeley & Grabanski Land Partnership v. Keeley (In Re Keeley & Grabanski Land Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Power Equipment Co. v. Case Credit Corp. (In Re Power Equipment Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Murrin v. Hanson (In re Murrin)District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Farmland Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2004
- In Re Coachworks Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.