Legal Opinion

VALENCIA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1986No. ID 3006PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision # 3006 MATTER OF VALENCIA In Deportation Proceedings A-24305559 Decided by Board February .14, 1986 Where the respondent presented a generalized statement on the Notice of Appeal (Form I-290A), failed to express the specific rationale for his conclusory assertions, filed no separate written brief, and did not seek oral argument to further explain the alleged error, his appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 § 3.1(d)(1- aXi) (1985) for failure to adequately specify the reasons for the appeal- CHARGE: Order Act of 1252 — Sec. Z41(aX2) j8 U.S.C. § 1251(aX2)] —Nonimmigrant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Juan Carlos Reyes-Mendoza v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. HOLGUINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  2. Oscar Rojas-Garcia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert S. Coleman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Sarbjit Singh v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Ahmed Bhiski v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States the United States Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Klodiana Pasha v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API